Matt Wolfe and his wife, Denise Furey (Photo from wolfe.org)

Editor’s Note: This is the third and final installment in a series of Q&A’s with local political candidates before the primary election on May 20. Wolfe is running in a special election for the City Council at Large seat, which every registered voter, no matter party affiliation, can vote in. For more information, visit: http://www.votespa.com.

J. Matthew Wolfe wants to change Philadelphia.

To Wolfe, a local lawyer with a practice near Clark Park, Philadelphia is a city with potential—one that can only shine brighter in the coming years. But, he says, that potential won’t be fully realized with the city’s current administration, which Wolfe claims has made Philly the “poorest big city in America.”

That’s why Wolfe is hoping to shake things up in this famously Democratic city. Running on the Republican ticket, Wolfe is vying for the City Council at Large seat vacated by Bill Green (who resigned to head the School Reform Commission) in a special election May 20th. And, according to Wolfe, a stronger Republican presence in the city government can only make for a better Philadelphia.

West Philly Local had a chance this week to chat with the 58-year-old Wolfe—who has a long, prestigious resume including a stint as Deputy Attorney General—about why he is running, and how he can reform the city he so loves.

West Philly Local: Why are you running for City Council?

Matt Wolfe: There’s a great reason to be optimistic about Philadelphia’s future. I’m out in West Philly, and driving down Chestnut and Market Streets during the day, winding around the hundreds of millions of dollars that are being invested in University City… Developers have enough confidence in our city. They’re coming in. They’re rehabbing things. And they’re doing it for one reason and one reason alone: they believe they can make some money there. … Point Breeze, a decade ago, was one of the most dangerous places in [South] Philly. No longer. And that is all happening in spite of the total lack of leadership at City Hall. Unfortunately, we would admit what we see that is good, we’re still lagging dangerously behind our peer cities—you know, New York, Washington [D.C.], Baltimore, Boston. … We’re behind. There’s no reason that we should be.  Continue Reading