Philadelphia Weekly published an important story yesterday about opposition to the proposed rehab of the 52nd Street shopping corridor.
One street vendor, Bashir Postley, was vocal in his opposition to the city’s multimillion plan to “revitalize” the historic shopping strip.
“Let’s call it what it is,” Postley told Philadelphia Weekly. “They gonna take the urban culture out of 52nd Street and make it into a little shopping mall for white people.”
The city’s plan includes the refurbishment of storefronts along 52nd Street.
Many vendors are angry that the city has taken down the custom awnings erected in 1976 to shield shoppers and vendors from the elements. The city has said that it was a necessary first step to determine how much work needed to be done. The city had originally planned to take the awnings down in 2009, but protests from vendors put that move on hold.
March 17th, 2011 at 12:21 pm
The City is actually responding the request of some of the merchants along the corridor (something the article briefly alludes to). The community response is mixed because there is not one voice to a community and so while some oppose this, others like it… Anyway, the idea that the City is actively pursuing a “gentrification” strategy is fundamentally ridiculous.
March 23rd, 2011 at 5:00 pm
why is it fundamentally ridiculous? please provide the logic behind the bold statement